Thread:FollowerofJuche/@comment-374001-20190418005634/@comment-38954675-20190731095418

FollowerofJuche wrote:

Why are not brutal imperialist warmongers like G.W Bush or Tony Blair allowed.

Tony Blair is not a "brutal imperialist warmonger", if you knew the history behind the Iraq War you would know that he was manipulated by the secret service into thinking that Saddam Hussein was in possession of weapons of mass destruction, forcing him to act as MI6 and the CIA made him think Saddam was a threat to British security. Same with George W Bush. Margret Thatcher was not a villain either, she attacked the Falklands because Argentina had invaded and the Falklands are a British territory. You might as well add anyone who crushed an invasion of their country because that was pretty much what Margret Thatcher did to get labeled an American imperialist's lackey. Also, what did Hillary Clinton do to deserve a page? Certainly not as much as the DPRK government, the current leader of which killed his uncle and his ambassador to the US without even trying them. The Kim Jong family is also known for keeping their entire population as borderline hostages, going so far as to kill their family and friends if they escape, sending people to brutal work camps where they will live in squalid conditions and receive little food or pay, and being a potential threat to nearby countries. I would take you more seriously if you would accept that not all capitalist leaders are war criminals (though I agree that Churchill and Obama would have serious charges to answer to in a court of law) and that just because the DPRK is communist doesn't make it good, instead of calling the site a "US lie machine" and labelling anything you don't agree with as "propaganda".