Thread:General MGD 109/@comment-3582624-20140222102918/@comment-3582624-20140222152415

My arguments you already know... bronies have literally created MILLIONS of sexualized images of the show's characters, to the point where the show's young fans cannot even look up fanart of their characters anymore, without finding porn.

There have been several cases of members of the "brony" fandom having sexual intercourse with horses, and bestiality is wrong on so many levels. Many are attracted sexually to the characters, who are all underaged, which also borders on pedophilia. The user you refer to, ResonX, is himself a (rather dedicated) member of the fandom and therefore not exactly the most neutral person to comment on this.

If you were to remove or rename the bronies page yet keep the one on anti-Bronies, this would seem as if you are measuring with double standards here and it would reflect badly on your wiki and it's sense of neutrality.

Now in my opinion, it is a bit weird for adult men to be so obsessed with a children's show meant for little girls. If it is done in good fun, in a harmless way, it is completely okay of course. But there are so many extreme people in the fandom it cannot be ignored. Your wiki has an article on the people who are extremely against the fandom (the anti-Bronies), then for good measure shouldn't there be an article about the fandom (the one I wrote and you made more neutral) to explain the reader why the fandom is so often criticized?

In my opinion both groups can be seen as a form of cyberbullying... a rather evil and villainous thing to do. By calling one group better or worse then the other, you would contribute to the bullying and the lack of understanding. The fairest way of dealing with the situation is by showing both sides of the discussion. So that you know what the anti-Bronies are against and why... rather then just write "they are bullies and they are mean, hurr durrr" which isn't very informative.

Anyway long story short... you have two articles here who seem to be a little controversial. But by just deleting one and keeping the other, you are using double standards which would be unfair.

I hope you understand and that I have not been much of an annoyance. Thanks already. PS: can I suggest you also link to the article Bronies in the page for anti-Bronies? Like: "for the other side of the discussion, see: Bronies", down the page like it says on the Bronies page? I cannot edit it as it still protected.

Thanks in advance. And sorry to cause trouble.